This is an important question for a variety of reasons. First, the hypocrisy of pornography. Second, the judgmentalism of those watching it. Third, you are right: that is someone's daughter.
Watching pornography has been around for a long, long time. It feeds into the sexual parts of our brains and is stimulating. But, like anything, it can become addictive and destructive.
Linda Lovelace - who was born Linda Boreman - was the main character of "Deep Throat." In some ways, she was a remarkable woman but in no way more so than when she spoke up about the abuse, rape, degradation of women, drugs, corruption and immorality of the pornography industry. In fact, according to 'Wikipedia', in 1986, Boreman published
Out of Bondage, a memoir focusing on her life after 1974. She testified before the 1986
Attorney General's Commission on Pornography in New York City, stating, "When you see the movie
Deep Throat, you are watching me being raped. It is a crime that movie is still showing; there was a gun to my head the entire time." Following Boreman's testimony for the
Meese Commission, she gave lectures on college campuses, decrying what she described as callous and exploitative practices in the pornography industry." And she should know: she was at the top of it.
The truth of the matter is that these men and women are actors and they are someone's son and daughter. They are looking to get famous and pornography is a relatively easy way to do it. They are searching for a lifestyle usually reserved for the rich and famous and they prostitute themselves to do it. Few of them succeed. Many get used up and discarded like trash. And participating in the exercise even by watching is, yes, hypocritical if you feel that exploiting young women and men is a sin. We know it happens and even by not watching, it will still happen. But watching it puts the viewer on the same continuum as the exploiter. From a point of view of Jewish law, participating in a sin, even as a secondary participant, is still a sin (although this is an overly-general principle). [For instance, a person has a moral obligation to prevent someone from engaging in sakana - a dangerous activity and is considered to have sinned if they could have stopped it but did not.]
I don't understand why you are worried about being judgemental to those who watch pornography. Sometimes judging someone is necessary. Judaism is founded upon justice. Pornography is not just. It is immoral. We can judge that which is immoral. In fact, you might say we have an obligation to stand up to injustice and accuse the unjust. Sometimes judgement is needed. However, the judgement may come in a form of leaving the room when porn is shown or perhaps not going to the strip bar with the guys. Live morally by taking a stand. You may be judged but better to be judged by doing something right than by simply following the crowd.
Having said all that, please don't think that I am somehow advocating asexuality. I am hardly asexual. Judaism discusses sex and, though many of our Talmudic discussions may be dated and, frankly, sexist, they are remarkably progressive for their time. Our teachers and Sages knew the importance of sex, the enjoyment of sex and were not afraid to experience and talk about sex. A famous story is related in gemara Berachot 62a, in which Rav Kahana hides under his teacher’s bed and listens as Rav Shemaya, his teacher, talks to his wife and takes care of his needs (a phrase that Rashi interprets as having sex.) When the teacher discovers Rav Kahana’s presence he is understandably angry, and demands that Rav Kahana leave. Rav Kahana refuses and declares that “this too is Torah” that he is obligated to learn. (This passage is used both to teach the healthy attitude Jews have toward sex as well as a critique of Rabbi Shemaya who would not speak openly about sex which is why Kahana had to hide under his bed in the first place! Ignorance about sex is still quite prevalent in many Jewish communities, by the way.)
Of course, the Song of Songs is an erotic love song between a man and a woman. And there are dozens of other references and discussions about sex.
But I want to be clear: it is my opinion that pornography is not about kosher sex. It serves the need of the animal which we have turned into an 'art form' - the need to orgasm. It is fake. It is all acted. And it is dehumanizing both to the actors and to the viewers. Jewish values stress the importance of 'in a place where there are no people, strive to be a person.' Strive to be a person in what you do and say, in public and private. In my opinion, pornography has nothing to recommend it in any way which is morally justifiable.
Answered by: Rabbi Cy Stanway